Over the last decade, a noticeable trend has emerged in television: seasons of TV shows are getting shorter. Long gone are the days when 22-episode seasons dominated primetime networks. Now, audiences are more accustomed to bingeing six to ten tightly crafted episodes on streaming platforms. This shift reflects broader changes in the entertainment landscape, driven by evolving viewer habits, new business models, and changing creative priorities. Let’s take a closer look at why this trend has taken hold and how it has reshaped the television industry.
The Golden Age of Television and Its Legacy
In the 20th century, television seasons followed a familiar formula. Broadcast networks like NBC, CBS, and ABC scheduled shows to fill a lengthy TV calendar. Most seasons featured 20 to 26 episodes, aligning with the September-to-May broadcast schedule. This format ensured networks had enough content to keep audiences engaged week after week while leaving room for reruns in the summer months.
However, this traditional structure often prioritized quantity over quality. Creators were expected to churn out multiple episodes on tight deadlines, which could result in uneven storytelling, filler episodes, and burnout for writers, actors, and production teams. Despite these challenges, the lengthy seasons created a sense of routine for viewers and offered ample time for character development and sprawling story arcs.
Enter the 21st century, where cable networks like HBO, AMC, and FX began shaking up the status quo. Shows like The Sopranos, Mad Men, and Breaking Bad ushered in the “Golden Age of Television” with shorter, high-quality seasons ranging from 10 to 13 episodes. These cable hits demonstrated that shorter seasons allowed for more focused storytelling and higher production values, paving the way for today’s TV landscape.
Streaming Platforms and the Demand for Bingeable Content
The rise of streaming platforms like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video in the 2010s fundamentally changed how audiences consumed TV. Instead of waiting a week for a new episode, viewers could binge entire seasons in one sitting. To cater to this new consumption model, streaming services began producing shorter seasons that prioritized tightly written narratives designed to hook audiences.
Netflix’s Stranger Things is a prime example of this approach. With its eight-episode seasons, the show delivers a fast-paced story arc that keeps viewers engaged from start to finish. By contrast, a 22-episode season would likely dilute the suspense and lose momentum. The shift to shorter seasons also allowed streaming platforms to release new shows year-round, keeping subscribers entertained and engaged.
Creative Freedom and the End of Filler Episodes
Shorter seasons have given creators more freedom to tell the stories they want without being constrained by the traditional 20-episode mandate. This has led to tighter storytelling, with fewer filler episodes that exist solely to meet an episode quota. Anthology series like Black Mirror and Fargo have embraced this approach, delivering self-contained seasons or episodes that prioritize quality over quantity.
Even legacy networks have adapted to the trend. Shows like This Is Us and The Good Place aired seasons with fewer than 20 episodes, demonstrating that shorter seasons can still work within the network framework. By focusing on fewer episodes, creators can maintain a consistent level of quality and keep audiences invested.
Financial Considerations in a Crowded Market
The economics of television have also played a significant role in the trend toward shorter seasons. Producing 20+ episodes per season is expensive, particularly for shows with large ensembles or high production values. In an era where streaming services and cable networks are competing to produce prestige content, shorter seasons allow studios to allocate resources more effectively.
Moreover, shorter seasons enable networks and streaming platforms to take more creative risks. Instead of committing to a 22-episode season, platforms can greenlight a six-episode series to test the waters. This approach has led to innovative storytelling and the rise of miniseries like HBO’s Chernobyl and Netflix’s The Queen’s Gambit, which have garnered critical acclaim.
The Downside of Shorter Seasons
While shorter seasons have many benefits, they’re not without drawbacks. For one, audiences accustomed to longer seasons may feel shortchanged. A six-episode season can leave viewers wanting more, particularly if it’s a year or more before the next installment arrives. Additionally, shorter seasons can make it harder for secondary characters and subplots to receive adequate development, which may impact the depth and richness of a show’s world.
Another challenge is the growing prevalence of multi-year gaps between seasons. Prestige shows like Stranger Things and Euphoria often take extended breaks to accommodate the demands of shorter seasons and higher production values. While this ensures quality, it can test viewers’ patience and make it harder for shows to maintain momentum.
The Future of Television Seasons
As streaming continues to dominate and traditional networks adapt to the new normal, shorter seasons are likely here to stay. The industry’s focus on quality, flexibility, and bingeable content has reshaped how TV is produced and consumed. However, striking a balance between quality and audience satisfaction will remain a challenge. Shows must navigate the trade-offs of shorter seasons while keeping viewers engaged and invested.
Ultimately, the shift toward shorter seasons reflects a broader evolution in how we experience television. By prioritizing quality over quantity, today’s TV landscape has set a new standard for storytelling, ensuring that every episode counts. Whether you’re binging the latest streaming hit or savoring a carefully crafted drama, one thing is clear: television’s shorter seasons are here to stay—and they’re redefining what it means to tell a great story.
Leave a Reply